John Taolo Gaetsewe

Back to provinceRead more

Draft Climate Change Plan

The table below provides a list of drafted climate change plan documents that are available for download for the John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality.
File Name
Year
Size (MB)
Type
Download
John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality CC Presentation201612,980Power Point<a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LH0iAMGuSzORax_ruJERJYM9EYWq586rd3q03NPonFM/export/pptx&quot; target="_blank">Download</a>
John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality CC Response Plan20162,792WORD<a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B98u4HJRN5rrc3B6LWx4eGF5UlU&resourcekey=0-g5LMALsVKfj0pF5urRmyJQ&rtpof=true&sd=true&quot; target="_blank">Download</a>

Key Climate Hazards

Increasing temperatures

The figure below shows projected changes in annual average temperatures, highlighting increasing temperatures throughout the district for the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario. By 2050, the district is projected to be affected by higher annual average temperatures, which will adversely affect water and food security.  Evaporation rates will also likely increase and agricultural outputs may reduce.

Figure: Projected changes in annual average temperatures throughout John Taolo Gaetsewe over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Increasing rainfall variability

The figure below shows projected shifts in annual average rainfall throughout the district between 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Annual average rainfall amounts vary across the district. There is uncertainty regarding projected future rainfall.

Figure: Projected changes in annual average rainfall throughout John Taolo Gaetsewe over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Increasing storms and flooding events

The figure below shows projected changes in the annual average number of extreme rainfall days throughout the district over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario.  Increases in the number of rainfall days are likely to result in an increase in intense storms, and flooding events across the district.

Figure: Projected changes in the annual average number of extreme rainfall days throughout John Taolo Gaetsewe over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Changing Biomes

The current delineation of biomes is depicted in the figure below, with the predicted shift in biomes shown in the following figure based on a high-risk scenario. The biomes have varying sensitivities to the projected impacts of climate change which are further exacerbated by issues such as the fragmentation of natural areas and unsustainable water usage rates.

Figure: The current delineation of biomes in John Taolo Gaetsewe (SANParks 2011a)
Figure: The predicted shift in biomes in John Taolo Gaetsewe using a high-risk scenario (SANParks 2011b)

Climate Change Vulnerability

A climate change vulnerability assessment is a way of identifying and prioritising impacts from climate change. The IPCC defines vulnerability as:

"Vulnerability to climate change is the degree to which geophysical, biological and socio-economic systems are susceptible to, and unable to cope with, adverse impacts of climate change" 

Summary of Climate Change Response Plan

A vulnerability assessment lets you identify these adverse impacts of climate change that are most important to your area. The climate change vulnerability assessment process that is used in this toolkit identified the following indicators in the table below.

Theme
Indicator Title
Exposure
Exposure Comment
Sensitivity
Sensitivity Comment
Adaptive Capacity
Adaptive Capacity Comment
AgricultureIncreased risks to livestockYesExtremely vulnerable. Impacts on the husbandry for livestock (grazing, management and health)HighDrought, reduced productivity, low grazing capacity.
No water infrastructure in the rural areas and villages.
LowStatistics SA
Drought relief programme (Department of Agriculture) - subsistence farmers are supplied with animal feed.
Farmer support programmes (farmer empowerment).
Funding.
Awareness campaigns to reduce overgrazing.
Veld fires.
Proven water accessibility (Municipal water tankers).
Utilise Lesotho highland water project (LHWP) since Botswana is also planning to utilise it.
Biodiversity and EnvironmentIncreased impacts on environment due to land-use changeYesKathu area- Mining activities, renewable energy plants, new mines that take up areas of greater than 100ha such as the Hotazel manganese mines. The existing mining areas are expanding.HighLoss of biodiversity, critical species. The Kathu forest is an important buffer zone that is being threatened due to proposed development.LowThere is existing Policy and Legislation, however there is a delay in processes e.g. EIA processes. Biodiversity offsets should be implemented when large developments are approved. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), Department of Mineral Resources (DMR).
Human HealthIncreased heat stressYesExtreme heat is the contributing factor.
HighIncreased number of patients in paediatric and geriatric wards.
Shortage of medical doctors.
LowNo finance available to support the health facilities.
Conduct awareness campaigns on the impacts of heat stress, especially in schools as children often have to walk long distances to school, and children often bring the message home to other family members. The campaign could take the form of a competition.
Human HealthIncreased malnutrition and hunger as a result of food insecurityYesReduction in protein diet availability.HighRuralness of the area leads to Isolated communities.
Lack of rainfall, leads to little access to potable water. People thus rely on groundwater.
Capacity is low - Environmental Health Practitioners (EHPs)
LowWar room on poverty - Department of Social Development deals with poverty.
Research
Strategies in place, nut they are not enough.
Human HealthIncreased air pollutionYesAir pollution from the mines, dust pollution, and indoor air pollution.HighSignificant growth in mining area.
Secondary pollution cases (e.g. from gravel roads) still experienced by schools, individuals and households.
LowSection 78 -air quality assessment underway.
Three monitoring stations for air pollution.
Mining houses conducting assessments and reporting on air pollution.
Human HealthIncreased Occupational health problemsYesFarm Labourers and open cast mining activities.HighLots of informal and rural settlements that are not compliant with regard to national building regulations.LowNo policies in place.
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementLoss of industrial and labour productivityYesMining related industries, e.g. in Joe Morolong and Gamagara local municipalities.HighIron ore and manganese mining contributes significantly to the economy.LowNo institutional capacity in the environmental health unit (John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality)
No research that the District Municipality is aware of.
No policy that the District Municipality is aware of.
No budgets.
Mining policies in place.
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementIncreased impacts on traditional and informal dwellingsYesAll the local municipalities are experiencing unplanned informal dwellings.HighFloods, fires, drought, erosion , basic infrastructure, water and sanitation are issues.LowFire response (fire brigade)
Challenge: accessibility and response time.
Disaster management plan .
Bulk master plan for the District Municipal Area.
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementIncreased isolation of rural communitiesYesInaccessibility to a number of services in different areas, especially in Joe Morolong Local Municipality.HighJoe Morolong, the biggest Local Municipality, is mostly rural (about 90%) and about 60% of Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality is rural.LowFire response (fire brigade)
Challenge: accessibility and response time.
Disaster management plan .
Bulk master plan for the District Municipal Area.
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementIncreased migration to urban and peri-urban areasYesPopulation is decreasing in Joe Morolong Local Municipality and increasing in Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality, affecting the economy.HighMinimal opportunities in rural areas, leading to high unemployment and grant dependency. Poor transport infrastructure including bridges and roads, and poor access to services in the rural areas.LowRural development plan. Comprehensive rural development plan. Revision of Spatial Development Framework (SDF). Local Economic Development (LED) Strategy. Integrated Development Strategy.
WaterDecreased quality of drinking waterYesHigh level of nitrates in Makatirus Area (Joe Moroleng)
Gamagara Local Municipality.
Ga-Segonyana Local Municipality.
HighAverage of the three Local Municipalities = 48.5.
New data required as the situation has deteriorated.
There is no rainfall and little to no dilution of waste water.
LowBoreholes have dried up.
There is a need to establish new water works.
There is a need to upgrade existing water works.
Finance and human capacity required.
WaterDecreased water quality in ecosystem due to floods and droughtsYesDue to drought and urbanisation, water demand has increased. Unlined pitlatrines are impacting on the quality of ground water.HighAverage of three Local Municipalities is 43.6.
New data is required.
LowThere is a need to establish new water works.
There is a need to upgrade existing water works.
There is a possibility of using grey water for flushing toilets.
Finance required.
WaterLess water available for irrigation and drinkingYesLess water available due to higher temperatures and the subsequent evaporation and transpiration. Increased population due to migrant workers places strain on water resource availability.HighAvailability of safe drinking water to all communities.
Groundwater is the main source of water in John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality and communities depend on it.
6,2 incidences per 1,000 children.
LowGrey water can be used for irrigation purposes.
Aging infrastructure is a concern.
Vandalisation of water resources (e.g. taps) is a problem- Retrofititing plastic for metal is a possible solution.
Different service providers for water, with different tariffs structures.
Insufficient qualified staff (capacity).
No indigent list for villages.
WaterIncreased impacts of flooding from litter blocking storm water and sewer systemsYesBlocked drainage system due to littering, ageing infrastructure and lack of maintenance.HighApproximately 60% of households have no access to rubbish disposal.
*new data required there is no true reflection of what is happening in JT District
LowJohn Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality is mostly rural.
Illegal dumping occurs.
Maintenance of waste management equipment.

The CSIR Greenbook has also developed and refined a vulnerability assessment framework by collating relevant data into composite vulnerability indicators. Four local municipality level vulnerability indices were computed and are shown spatially below.

Socio-Economic Vulnerability

Social inequalities are the factors that affect the susceptibility and coping mechanisms of communities and households. Indicators for social vulnerability attempt to consider the sensitivity, response and recovery from the impacts of natural hazards. The CSIR Green Book has developed a socio-economic vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability).   The map below shows the Socio-Economic vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Socio-economic vulnerability per local municipality in John Taolo Gaetsewe (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Environmental Vulnerability

Environmental vulnerability describes the vulnerability and risk to the natural environment and the impacts on the ecological infrastructure of which surrounding settlements are dependent. The environmental risk of an area includes ecosystems, habitats, physical and biological processes (reproduction, diversity, energy flows, etc). The CSIR Green Book has developed an Environmental Vulnerability Index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the environmental vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Environmental vulnerability per local municipality in John Taolo Gaetsewe (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Physical Vulnerability

Physical vulnerability describes the physical fabric and connectedness of settlements (buildings and infrastructure) and focuses mainly on the conditions that exist before a hazard occurs and the expected level of resulting loss. The CSIR Green Book has developed a physical vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the physical vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Physical vulnerability per local municipality in John Taolo Gaetsewe (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Economic Vulnerability

Economic vulnerability describes the potential risks posed by hazards on economic assets and processes. Potential hazards can include job losses, increased poverty and interruptions in business activities. The CSIR Green Book has developed an economic vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the economic vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Economic vulnerability per local municipality in John Taolo Gaetsewe (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

References