Pixley Ka Seme

Back to provinceRead more

Draft Climate Change Plan

The table below provides a list of drafted climate change plan documents that are available for download for the Pixley Ka Seme District Municipality.
File Name
Year
Size (MB)
Type
Download
Pixley Ka Seme District Municipality CC Presentation201612,980Power Point<a href="https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/19dFiwjA197ycOA_jMOK5UzhNpIzLZ_NjP91mDdGqKXs/export/pptx&quot; target="_blank">Download</a>
Pixley Ka Seme District Municipality CC Response Plan20163,599WORD<a href="https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B98u4HJRN5rrcGpuOEw0dW11MGs&resourcekey=0-pj81HXXh6UtDdAAzcCsMkw&rtpof=true&sd=true&quot; target="_blank">Download</a>

Key Climate Hazards

Increasing temperatures

The figure below shows projected changes in annual average temperatures, highlighting increasing temperatures throughout the district for the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario. By 2050, the district is projected to be affected by higher annual average temperatures, which will adversely affect water and food security.  Evaporation rates will also likely increase and agricultural outputs may reduce.

Figure: Projected changes in annual average temperatures throughout Pixley Ka Seme over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Increasing rainfall variability

The figure below shows projected shifts in annual average rainfall throughout the district between 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario. Annual average rainfall amounts vary across the district. There is uncertainty regarding projected future rainfall.

Figure: Projected changes in annual average rainfall throughout Pixley Ka Seme over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Increasing storms and flooding events

The figure below shows projected changes in the annual average number of extreme rainfall days throughout the district over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario.  Increases in the number of rainfall days are likely to result in an increase in intense storms, and flooding events across the district.

Figure: Projected changes in the annual average number of extreme rainfall days throughout Pixley Ka Seme over the period 2021-2050 under the RCP 8.5 scenario (CSIR 2019)

Changing Biomes

The current delineation of biomes is depicted in the figure below, with the predicted shift in biomes shown in the following figure based on a high-risk scenario. The biomes have varying sensitivities to the projected impacts of climate change which are further exacerbated by issues such as the fragmentation of natural areas and unsustainable water usage rates.

Figure: The current delineation of biomes in Pixley Ka Seme (SANParks 2011a)
Figure: The predicted shift in biomes in Pixley Ka Seme using a high-risk scenario (SANParks 2011b)

Climate Change Vulnerability

A climate change vulnerability assessment is a way of identifying and prioritising impacts from climate change. The IPCC defines vulnerability as:

"Vulnerability to climate change is the degree to which geophysical, biological and socio-economic systems are susceptible to, and unable to cope with, adverse impacts of climate change" 

Summary of Climate Change Response Plan

A vulnerability assessment lets you identify these adverse impacts of climate change that are most important to your area. The climate change vulnerability assessment process that is used in this toolkit identified the following indicators in the table below.

Theme
Indicator Title
Exposure
Exposure Comment
Sensitivity
Sensitivity Comment
Adaptive Capacity
Adaptive Capacity Comment
AgricultureChange in grain (maize, wheat & barley) productionYesProduction along the major rivers, dependent on water availability and run off. Therefore less runoff. Potential to grow grain in Norvalspont, Colesberg, Vanderkloof, Petrusville, Hopetown, Douglas, Prieska and Marydale.HighOnly towns near the Orange River are dependant on grain production.
Water restrictions.
LowClimate Change Toolkit; Agri Co-operations (e.g.. GWKOVK)
AgricultureIncreased risks to livestockYesDroughts, less grazing, increased livestock mortality. Sheep, cattle, goats and game are present in the District Municipal Area.HighCommercial exports
Small scale subsistence farmers
LowFarmers, GWK (agribusiness), Department of Rural Development and Land Reform.
Support programme run by Department of Agriculture for all farmers.
Support programme run by Department of Rural Development and Land Reform for small scale farmers.
Biodiversity and EnvironmentIncreased impacts on environment due to land-use changeYesSolar, Square Kilometre Array (SKA), Fracking. Urbanisation.HighContinuing of land change as point of renewable energy corridor.
Expansion of SKA site.
Groundwater contamination possibility.
LowState of Environment Report.
Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) for renewable energy corridor.
Biodiversity and EnvironmentLoss of Priority Wetlands and River ecosystemsYesHanover, Colesburg area (Orange River), Riet ,Vaal River.HighCommunity around these wetlands are dependant upon them - they are ecological support areas.LowRAMSAR Site
Working for Water and Working for Wetland programmes (to be confirmed)
Human HealthHealth impacts from increased storm eventsYesLoss of life (Humans and animals), relocation of families, damage to informal structures and households; and mental issues (such as depression).HighDouglas
Prieska
Overflow of water treatment plant.
LowSouth African Police Service, Department of Health, Northern Cape Department of Cooperative Governance, Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs (COGHSTA), Disaster Management Unit.
Human HealthIncreased vector borne diseases from spread of mosquitoes, ticks, sandflies, and blackfliesYesIncrease in mosquito and tick population; Increase in skin irritation; Increase in midgesHighDue to domestic farming within residential areas within the district there are high cases of tick bites.LowSA Weather Service, Department of Health, Statistics SA, Department of Agriculture. Not enough Environmental Health Practitioners. No commonage land.
Human HealthIncreased water borne and communicable diseases (e.g. typhoid fever, cholera and hepatitis)YesNegative impact of human health due to polluted water. Increase in mosquito and tick population; Increase in skin irritation; Increase in midges.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB).
HighContamination of water sources- Waste water treatment plants.
Illegal water pipe connections.
LowSA Weather Services, Department of Health, Statistics SA; Department of Agriculture.
Human HealthIncreased Occupational health problemsYesIncrease in temperature leads to decrease in productivity.
Agricultural sector, mines, construction all work outside.
HighMost work is outside which requires people to be active outside.LowSA Weather, Department of Health, Department of Agriculture, Statistics SA
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementIncreased impacts on strategic infrastructureYesCracks in roads cause car accidents, damage to bridges and loss of life.
Vaal River overflows - Douglas.
Flooding of water bridge and fly over - De Aar.
HighIf the bridges flood, the town is not accessible.
Impacts infrastructure.
LowDepartment of Transport, Safety and Liaison.
Require financing to implement the disaster management plan.
Disaster management policy is outdated.
Lack of institutional capacity
Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Disaster ManagementDecreased income from tourismYesLess access to tourism hotspots. Less interest in water recreational facilities (Swimming, fishing, river rafting) in the Gariep and Vanderkoof dams.
Branding, marketing, nature reserves, historical monument garden of remembrance, rock art and the Square Kilometre Array (SKA).
HighAccommodation, roads and dams.LowDepartment of Tourism; Northern Cape Department: Environment and Nature Conservation; and Northern Cape Tourism Authority (NCTA) are all under capacitated.
No plans or finance developed.
WaterDecreased quality of drinking waterYesIncreases in salt concentration, turbidity, and groundwater dependence are due to decreases in available water, and increases in pollution and sediments. Impacts of Fracking as lower parts of Karroo will be affected. ExplorationHighDistrict Municipal average. Water quality and stress already occuring in the District: Specific Municipalities. Asbestos contamination of groundwater. No recharge and dilution from rain and other sources.LowDepartment of Water and Sanitation, Climate Change Toolkit, Blue Drop, general knowledge, Municipal studies.
Reverse osmosis process.
WaterLess water available for irrigation and drinkingYesThe whole district area is arid, therefore the impact is higher. Orange River 100km away. Highly dependent on ground water in De Aar. High salt content. Vier West, Vosburg, Loxton, Van Wyksvlei.HighVery frequent cases of diarrhoea. Water quality is a causal factor. Water treatment plants don’t chlorinate due to financial constraints.
LowDepartment of Water and Sanitation, District Integrated Development Plan (IDP), Municipal Feasibility Studies, District Environmental management framework (EMF).
Boiling water alert system.
Regular (monthly) water testing.
Environmental Health Practitioners in each Municipality.
These projects are however insufficient to bring about the significant change that is required within the sector.

The CSIR Greenbook has also developed and refined a vulnerability assessment framework by collating relevant data into composite vulnerability indicators. Four local municipality level vulnerability indices were computed and are shown spatially below.

Socio-Economic Vulnerability

Social inequalities are the factors that affect the susceptibility and coping mechanisms of communities and households. Indicators for social vulnerability attempt to consider the sensitivity, response and recovery from the impacts of natural hazards. The CSIR Green Book has developed a socio-economic vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability).   The map below shows the Socio-Economic vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Socio-economic vulnerability per local municipality in Pixley Ka Seme (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Environmental Vulnerability

Environmental vulnerability describes the vulnerability and risk to the natural environment and the impacts on the ecological infrastructure of which surrounding settlements are dependent. The environmental risk of an area includes ecosystems, habitats, physical and biological processes (reproduction, diversity, energy flows, etc). The CSIR Green Book has developed an Environmental Vulnerability Index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the environmental vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Environmental vulnerability per local municipality in Pixley Ka Seme (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Physical Vulnerability

Physical vulnerability describes the physical fabric and connectedness of settlements (buildings and infrastructure) and focuses mainly on the conditions that exist before a hazard occurs and the expected level of resulting loss. The CSIR Green Book has developed a physical vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the physical vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Physical vulnerability per local municipality in Pixley Ka Seme (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

Economic Vulnerability

Economic vulnerability describes the potential risks posed by hazards on economic assets and processes. Potential hazards can include job losses, increased poverty and interruptions in business activities. The CSIR Green Book has developed an economic vulnerability index that is measured on a scale from 1 (low vulnerability) to 10 (high vulnerability). The map below shows the economic vulnerability score of each municipality in the district visually.

Figure: Economic vulnerability per local municipality in Pixley Ka Seme (Le Roux, van Huyssteen, et al. 2019)

References